[thelist] do not use the javascript: link protocol - why? (was: collapsible elements without using IDs)
Christian Heilmann
lists at onlinetools.org
Tue Dec 7 11:16:13 CST 2004
Stephen Rider wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2004, at 8:13 AM, Sarah Sweeney wrote:
>
>>> P.S: Never, under _any_ circumstances use javascript: as a link
>>> protocol. It is a bad habit that MUST die.
>>
>>
>> I think I know why you are (so adamantly) advocating this, but I'm
>> not 100% certain. Can you fill us in, please?
>
>
> I don't have a problem with it so long as it's backed up with a
> standard href that works without javascript. (href with standard html
> link followed by a javascript 'onclick' ending in "return false")
>
> I agree that a site's primary functionality should not depend on
> Javascript; but "never" is an overused word.
>
Errr..... onclick="Javascript:foo()" is redundant. onclick="foo()" is
enough. Therefore I assumed Javascript: links to be ones without any
real HREF.
More information about the thelist
mailing list