I would never depend or use DW . Andrew >-----Original Message----- >From: thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org >[mailto:thelist-bounces at lists.evolt.org] On Behalf Of >Rickards, Julian (NDM) >Sent: 20 July 2006 16:00 >To: thelist at lists.evolt.org >Subject: Re: [thelist] CSS layout changes > > >Hi John: > ><snip>My reason for declaring this page XHTML 1.1 Strict was >simply because another person on TheList who had helped me >with the header of this layout suggested doing so. I have no >problem at all with using another DTD/namespace, so long as I >can find a valid declaration for it.</snip> > > >I must admit that I haven't heard of XHTML 1.1 *Strict* before >because the Strict designation was used in HTML 4.01 and XHTML >1.0 to separate them from Transitional and Frameset. > > ><snip>Perhaps the most frustrating part about all this: >Dreamweaver's preview shows the page almost precisely the way >I'd like it to look. Do you use DW for CSS-based layouts? Are >there any good alternatives for WinXP systems?</snip> > > >Firefox? Opera? LOL > >I have recently created a layout for a client and it renders >terribly in DW but is fine in Opera, Firefox and IE. I >wouldn't depend on DW all the time, especially for layout >(text styling is fine). > >Jules >-- > >* * Please support the community that supports you. * * http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org Workers of the Web, evolt !