[thelist] "Web 2.0 sites with the big friendly fonts"
trevor
trevor at intospace.ca
Wed Feb 21 13:58:04 CST 2007
first of all, about this:
> On 2007/02/21 16:57 (GMT) Barney Carroll apparently typed:
>
>> What do you mean by "basing designs on 100% of user defaults"?
>
if you RE-READ the original message, he said "not" right before your
snip, making your quote 100% misleading. the original quote would be:
"Maybe it's an indirect impetus to get designers to see the folly of not
basing designs on 100% of user defaults. 100% of user defaults leaves it up
to each user to decide what's too big or too small or just right for his
local environment."
moving on...
i went and read that 100% e2r article, and while i may agree with some of
it, the whole thing strikes me as a bit hypocritical. its main premise is
to let people do what they want, as in: leave their settings alone and never
choose for them. yet, designers are NOT allowed to choose?? what if i, the
almighty designer - WANT A SMALL FONT. then to hell with that article - if
i WANT A SMALL font, then i will HAVE A SMALL FONT.
- even if only to chase away people who hate small fonts. maybe i actually
don't want them, maybe i mock design to create design, maybe i'm a small
interest group who loves to squint...
- now clearly i'm being hypothetical - i don't love really small fonts per
se, but i love the freedom to choose. and i actually DO think that the e2r
article makes sense in a restricted way, but i really get pissed when
so-called "designers" get carried away and start telling me what i should
like, and what's right and what's wrong. it's just YET ANOTHER OPINION -
can't you afford any modesty at all? don't tell me my choice is wrong cause
you don't like it - maybe i don't want you to like it.
boy, the level of arrogance in that article made me want to create a totally
UnR34D4B13 s1T3 <--just 4 kix.
design means choice, so stop telling people their choice is wrong - it may
not be for *most* - but then neither was picasso, or cubism, or abstract -
thank god they broke rules .
finally - i'm interested to your consideration of this: if you are writing
INFORMATION for seniors, then sure, make it big and clear - but if you are
peddling 50cent ringtones to punks, and your site looks lke that article's
banal, standardized, vanilla pudding - then kiss your demographic goodbye.
just sayin....and maybe i'm not 100% clear of what i'm saying, so there.
More information about the thelist
mailing list