Mattias Thorslund wrote: >> But but but, the details are usually quite helpful. Why are you able to >> use inline css and nothing else? > > One case when inline CSS styling is pretty much the only "safe" bet is > HTML emails, isn't it? That would be because many email clients don't > support a <style> tag in the document (which would be much prettier IMO). > > My experience on this might be outdated, however. That was why details of the situation would be helpful -- Casey did not say that this was for email; IIRC he didn't state which media this would be for at all. As for css styling in HTML email, it's not quite as bad as all that[0], or at least until it wasn't until Outlook 2007 arrived[1]. Sigh. [0] http://www.sitepoint.com/article/code-html-email-newsletters [1] http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2007/01/10/microsoft-breaks-html-email-rendering-in-outlook/ -- Max Schwanekamp NeptuneWebworks.com 541-255-2171