Robert O'Rourke wrote: > Christian Heilmann wrote: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqFOB77jLaE > > > > good crikey! that made me eyes go gozzy. > > so which file is smaller? the HTML or the image? :-P I ran a comparison on that :-P I took a 2445x1767 stock photo and ran a PHP script to convert it to a table based HTML file. I didn't take rowspan and colspan into account, so each image pixel is its own td, but the 2 MB jpeg image turned into a 263 MB HTML file... For those interested: <http://prive.rickdenhaan.net/swimming.jpg> and <http://prive.rickdenhaan.net/swimming.html>. It's on my private server at home, though, which isn't too fast a connection. > would it kill a pc to use javascript to animate something like that? Probably :-) Rick.
