[thelist] sub-domain???
Jon Molesa
rjmolesa at consoltec.net
Thu Aug 9 10:17:30 CDT 2007
I know there are technical reasonings but personally I prefer
sub-domains. They're easier to remember (for me) and have a sense of
permanent-ness. I've read articles about google love in regards to
sub-domains and when to use them. But my basic understanding is that
there isn't a huge difference between sub-folder and sub-domain when it
comes to optimization. Both can be treated as a separate and complete
site in it's own right. I think if there is weight to be carried then
the sub-domain would "look" better to the bots that the sub-folder.
Just my 2 cents.
*On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:47:36AM -0600 Bob Meetin <ontheroad at frii.com> wrote:
> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 08:47:36 -0600
> From: Bob Meetin <ontheroad at frii.com>
> To: "thelist at lists.evolt.org" <thelist at lists.evolt.org>
> Subject: [thelist] sub-domain???
>
> I have never set up a sub-domain, am not familiar with the
> benefits/purpose. However here is the situation... I have a site that
> is doing well on its own, but we are in the process of designing a child
> site (more tailored to a teen, young adult's audience). In developing
> it I have it set up as a subdirectory of the parent, i.e.:
>
> parent
> parent/teens
>
> Nothing complicated. I have a number of SQL queries that are shared by
> the 2 sites, slightly different flavor. I also have a custom stats
> script that without pain can separate out numbers fairly easily.
>
> Is this a candidate for a sub-domain or is that a different beast?
> Otherwise it would be easy enough to set up a new domain.
>
> -Bob
>
> --
>
> * * Please support the community that supports you. * *
> http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
>
> For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester
> and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org
> Workers of the Web, evolt !
--
Jon Molesa
rjmolesa at consoltec.net
if you're bored or curious
http://rjmolesa.com
More information about the thelist
mailing list