I honestly think it's irrelevant for the purpose of most desktop web layouts. I'd be horrified to think what kind of design would warrant more than 1024px in width… Regards, Barney Carroll barney.carroll at gmail.com 07594 506 381 On 20 May 2010 18:16, Ed McCarroll <Ed at comsimplicity.com> wrote: >> So I went back to the browser stats page and was surprised at the >> > percentage of screens at or above 1440x900. It amounts to about 33%. > > Which "browser stats page"? Beware of sites like > http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp, which have great info > on their own constituency, i.e. us geeks. > > If you poll the folks I hang with, you'll find that 1440x900 is totally for > wimps! > > ----------------------- > Edward W. McCarroll > Ed at ComSimplicity.com > 310.904.3651 > > -- > > * * Please support the community that supports you. * * > http://evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > For unsubscribe and other options, including the Tip Harvester > and archives of thelist go to: http://lists.evolt.org > Workers of the Web, evolt ! >