[thechat] A balance of opinion.

[John Handelaar]

On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 13:34, rudy wrote:

> civil disobedience is wrong, 

You actually, honestly, believe that to the extent
that you don't want to qualify it?

Let's say, for example, that civil disobedience in
the cause of civil rights in the 60s might have had
justification.  Also wrong?  Or were they supposed
to wait for Strom and co to decide on their own that
they didn't want to be racist fuckers any more?

How about if Nixon had (as proved) known about a
deliberate attempt to interfere with a federal election
and chosen *not* to resign?  What about then?

-- 
John Handelaar <john at evolt.org.uk>