[thechat] Bill Frist on the Iraq War: WMD wasn't the main reason ...
R.Livsey
R.Livsey at cache-22.co.uk
Thu Jun 26 19:54:14 CDT 2003
Martin wrote:
>One could argue that the US therefore has a duty to invade plenty of other
>countries... including itself. Iraq's *way* down the list of BadGuys(tm).
>
>Cheers
>Martin
>
>
(disclaimer in advance.. just got back from a bbq where the alcohol was
flowing readily so....)
What I happened to find quite funny was an interview with some high-up
American guy a couple of weeks ago where he said something along the
lines of (On the topic of N Korea et al developing nuclear weapons) :
paraphrased : "we can't let these nations develop nuclear weapons (or
other WMD) because they could then use them to bully other countries
just because they have superior weapons and this isn't right"
Seems a bit hypocritical coming from the USA!
Isn't that just what the USA does/is doing? If history was different and
some other bunch of countries/nations developed nuclear weapons first
then we would probably be in the same state with some other superpower
calling the shots.
--
R.Livsey
Incutio Web Developer
[ PHP | Perl | Java | C# ]
www.cache-22.co.uk
www.incutio.com
More information about the thechat
mailing list