[Theforum] PLEASE READ Article editing -- what are the sides??

[A. Erickson]

> That's how I hear it. If you're tallying, I'm  2.
> 
> If you're tally-hoeing, I'm a 44 regular.

LOL!

A vote is fine if people want to. I was going to propose that next but
wanted to make sure that I had the two proposals down right or if there
was a third that I missed.

If we can nail this down then we can vote on a direction. Then we can
figure out the 'how' the works.

- amanda


> > Okay, here's what I want to do -- I'd like to get consensus on the 
> > article editing issue. I want to focus on the what and not 
> the how or 
> > the why. Let's just boil it down here. It seems to me that 
> we have two 
> > core proposals on the table on article editing.
> > 
> > 
> > 1. Free
> > 
> > 2. Limited
> > 
> > 
> > The 'Free' proposal is for giving all current forum subscribers the 
> > ability to edit articles.
> > 
> > The 'Limited' proposal is for giving all current forum 
> subscribers the 
> > ability to join a group of editors and they will have the 
> ability to 
> > edit articles.
> > 
> > 
> > Is this correct?
> > 
> > - amanda
> > 
> > ___________________________________
> > amanda at gawow.com + http://gawow.com
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> theforum
> It's functional, not aesthetic.
>