[Theforum] policy for #evolt
Martin
martin at members.evolt.org
Thu Jan 10 18:24:55 CST 2002
On Friday, January 11, 2002, at 12:20 am, A. Erickson wrote:
>> Some time back I suggested:
>> * Adrian
>> * Dan
>> * Elfur
>> * Garrett
>> * Jeff
>> * Madhu
>> * Michele
>>
>> Without commenting on any of the existing people with ops,
>> I think all the above would make good ops. I'm sure there
>> are other people too.
>
> I think more than a few people should have top priveledges as well.
Sounds sensible (although I think you can only have one *owner*).
I put together that list without knowing that there were subdivisions
within ops.
> And,
> I think more than one top opp should be involved when someone is banned.
I can see the logic in that, although I can also see that
it might be valid that an op can take short-term action quickly
against someone who's being abusive and abusive and
keeps returning beyond kicks.
mmmm escalation process - what are the levels of action
and the thresholds of behaviour required before each can
be taken?
Cheers
Martin
_______________________________________________
email: martin at easyweb.co.uk PGP ID: 0xA835CCCB
martin at members.evolt.org snailmail: 30 Shandon Place
tel: +44 (0)774 063 9985 Edinburgh,
url: http://www.easyweb.co.uk Scotland
More information about the theforum
mailing list