Marlene Bruce wrote: > Thanks for the feedback and questions, everyone. The latest version is > below. > > Ron, what you wrote sounded great (I too was thinking it should be > linked to). It could be cleaned up a little for public consumption, > but I don't think it needs to be shortened too dramatically. IOW, > let's say pretty much the same thing, only a little more crisply. edit away. > Once we've edited it, where should we put Ron's explanation? Ron, do > you have a members site where you can post it? no, I don't, left that for folks who dont have servers. would it fit in a subsection or subpage of your support article?