[theforum] Design Competition: last chance for comment

Martin Burns martin at easyweb.co.uk
Wed Mar 1 10:46:18 CST 2006

On Wed, 01 Mar 2006 15:08:13 +0000, John Handelaar <john at userfrenzy.com> wrote:
> Martin Burns wrote:
>> On 28 Feb 2006, at 14:31, Sarah Adams wrote:
>>>>I'm assuming by the silence that no-one's got any serious objections
>>>>to this.
>>>>If that's still the case on Friday (probably late evening UK time),
>>>>I'll post this to thelist/thechat and write it up for weo.
> It's not clear from the wiki page what
> "Adherence to evolt.org branding" means
> in practice.
> We should clarify.  Not least so that *I*
> know what that's supposed to mean these days.

Actually, I quite like it a bit undefined and subjective - 
"does it feel like evolt..?" kind of openness, which as entrants
are prolly evolters, may and possibly should vary from person to

That said, branding considerations are:
1) Don't mess with the logo - not that we have original source files for it anyway
2) Some kind of black top bar to echo where we've been for over half a decade.
3) Unless you're proposing something *else* to mark out the different sites, weo has
a blue accent colour. Precise blue is prolly up for grabs.

"Names, once they are in common use   | Spammers: Send me email to
 quickly become mere sounds, their    | -> yumyum at easyweb.co.uk
 etymology being buried, like so many | my filter. Currently killing over
 of the earth's marvels, beneath the  | 99.9% of all known spams stone dead.
 dust of habit." - Salman Rushdie     | http://nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam

More information about the theforum mailing list