[theforum] *Productive* ways to proceed

Martin Burns martin at easyweb.co.uk
Tue Sep 12 03:14:54 CDT 2006

On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:23:42 -0400, "Matt Warden" <mwarden at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/11/06, William Anderson <neuro at well.com> wrote:
>> Matt Warden wrote:
>> > On 9/11/06, John Handelaar <john at userfrenzy.com> wrote:
>> >> So,  want a suitably-privacy-protected copy of WEO?  Let's
>> >> hear you, and I'll make sure it happens.
>> >
>> > Yes, we need test.evolt.org back.
>> It never left.
> Maybe it was my connection before? Anyway, is this synced with weo?

In functionality yes.
There's a couple of CSS differences which should have been rolled up to weo (larger fonts for one).
All the data (content/user) is from a year ago or so, which is OK.


"Names, once they are in common use   | Spammers: Send me email to
 quickly become mere sounds, their    | -> yumyum at easyweb.co.uk
 etymology being buried, like so many | my filter. Currently killing over
 of the earth's marvels, beneath the  | 99.9% of all known spams stone dead.
 dust of habit." - Salman Rushdie     | http://nuclearelephant.com/projects/dspam

More information about the theforum mailing list