this troubles me... i suspect you are not using the template i made, but are instead trying to munge the code that was already there into validating... this won't work too well since we have made a number of changes since that HTML was implemented... not all of them are layout, most of them are changes to the way the styles are used, and what tags get used in various places... if you look at http://roselli.org/new_evolt/layout/front.asp, you'll notice that the <form> tags are, in fact, inside the cell... if you were cutting and pasting that header, then there should be no problem validating it... you can see that at http://roselli.org/new_evolt/layout/, with the link to the validator... not to mention the entire header layout and image slices are different as well.... > From: "David McCreath" <mccreath at ak.net> > > In an effort to get the FAQ to validate this morning, I worked on the header > for the site. It now validates, and I don't think it needs anymore work. > Please do feel free to double-check it. > > For general info, the w3 validator was arguing about the <form> tags being > between table row tags, so I changed the table structure of the header > (increased the rowspan of the cell that holds the pull-down nav menu) to get > the <form> inside the same <td> as the nav menu itself. It validates, but I > haven't checked it in anything but IE 5.5/W2K. If somebody notices something > odd in another browser, let me know.