[thesite] UEUE v.0.2 Update

[.jeff]

matt,

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> From: Warden, Matt
>
> > i don't need your approval, nor am i asking for it.
>
> interesting. i thought we were moving towards
> consensus-based decisions.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

of course.  consensus != unanimous

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> by calling me immature?
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

no, by saying that the suggestion of putting a username/password combination
on the live db's datasource was security by obscurity.  it's not and you
know it.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> im not on the opposite. i'm on the "i don't see this as
> a benefit worth the work" side. SOOOOOO, like i've said
> 4 or 5 times before, if you're willing to do the work,
> rock on.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

right on, why didn't you just say that in the beginning?  i wasn't asking
you to do the work.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> > f.e.o. is your responsibility.
>
> Oh, it is? And why is that?
>
> Fuck that, I'm sorry.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

maybe responsibility of development on that subsite has shifted.  if it has,
i'm not aware of that happening in which case i apologize for saying it's
your responsibility.  the point of that though is that if there are sites
out there leveraging that datasource, it's the code owners responsibility to
either make it work or live without the access.  besides, it's not like
f.e.o. is even live yet.

thanks,

.jeff

http://evolt.org/
jeff at members.evolt.org
http://members.evolt.org/jeff/