[thesite] Rating Articles .. Whatcha think ?

[rudy]

> We already have too many people giving average articles 4s.
> I don't want to encourage that.

alrightee, we've had a lot of suggestions, many of which were rightly shot
down as being too american or idiomatic

the original scale was

     1 (bad)    2 (poor)     3 (okay)      4 (good)     5(great!!)

perhaps in view of matt's comment, we could consider

     1 (bad)    2 (poor)    3 (good)    4 (excellent)    5(outstanding)

i still think people are going to rate average articles with a 4 -- it's
only human nature


rudy