[thesite] test.evolt.org change fyi

[Warden, Matt]

On Nov 16, rudy had something to say about Re: [thesite] test.evolt.org...

>> i don't see how <small> offers any structure
>> or semantic meaning to the content within...
>
>oh shit, not this argument again
>
>look, if <h1> has semantic meaning, then so does <small>
>
>sure, i hear you saying, but there's a difference between a heading and
>plain text

yeah, i don't think that's a strong argument.

>well, yes and no. maybe so, i don't know
>
>but if <code> has semantic meaning, then so does <small>

Bah.

I'd rather say:

if <strong> has semantic meaning, so does <small>

<strong> is all about styling, whether it's how it's shown or how the
speech reader speaks is.

similarly with <small>, i think.

i'd never use <small> because it reminds me too much of when I was leaning
HTML by looking at the source of shit I made in AOLPress (yes, it's ok to
laugh... I am too).

personally, i think the tag should be <less-significant>, not <small>.

heh.


--
mattwarden
mattwarden.com