[thesite] Re: [Admin] category descriptions

[rudy]

nice job, em, i like your style

i think we'd be better leaving individuals' names out, though -- like
jeff's in FAQ

in Commentary, it's w3c, not wc3 (typo, most likely, eh?)

> Should we spell out "information architecture" somewhere?

ayup

>SUGGESTIONS:
are we keeping this category?

>REVIEWS & LINKS
> [I was thinking that maybe we can change the name of this category
>  to "reviews"

yes, links would now be better in d.e.o

>SOFTWARE
another misunderstood and underutilized category


rudelicious