[thesite] What do you want to do ?

[aardvark]

> From: "Michele Foster" <michele at wordpro.on.ca>
>
> Aard, probably not missed .. just set up so you can add em in your own
> words, etc. :)  Is what Dan wrote there or does he need to add his
> stuff too?

he's added it...

> | btw, as long as we're using the wiki to talk about plans for the |
> browser archive, should that be on theforum?
>
> No, I don't think that's necessary.  We're talking about development
> and making it better.  We're not discussing deleting it or not
> supporting it anymore.  Once the development reqs. have been flushed
> out and those working on the project agree, sure it wouldn't hurt to
> run it by theforum to make sure there's nothing overlooked.  It's
> difficult to know what goes where. But if we keep all development of
> stuff here, I think we'll be better off.

i brought it up anyway, since there's a lot we *can* talk about with
beo, especially things like:
- is it a bandwidth hog that contributes to the costs?
- can we ask for monies on it when the browsers don't belong to us?
- other ideas we may miss...

[...]
> Yeah .. but we can't stop people from working while everything gets
> sorted out and determined on theforum (or elsewhere).  That said, my
> understanding is that William has very limited SSH access and can't
> actually modify anything.  However, I'm not real good at understanding
> this stuff .. perhaps I should go read up on what SSH means and how it
> really works .. since I haven't a clue :)

well, a) i don't know what access he has since dan didn't let me
know, and i've been trying to get the beonix archive downloaded so i
can upload it, and i'd hate to do it if things are being moved...

and b) we *can* limit access, particularly since much of what's being
discussed on theforum is *precisely* because access was handed out
without anyone knowing...

i'm just surprised is all, given the commentary about limiting access
and working up a process to determine trust for people access is
handed to...  i don't mind the help, but i am surprised since it goes
against what dan has said...
--
Read the evolt.org case study
Usability: The Site Speaks for Itself
http://amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1904151035/
ISBN: 1904151035