aardvark wrote: > more along the lines of getting wiped (see other email), or if > permissions get changed, filenames confused, etc... why are you concerned that it wouldn't be taken care of just like any other files on there? > erm, didn't you talk about *not* handing out access to just anyone > because of security? i can track down posts, but this is part of the > logic behind *not* handing out root, among other things... william isn't just anyone, and he doesn't have root. the farthest thing from it actually as i pointed to in the email you responded to. anything else?