Hmm. Thinking about this a bit more... I really like the look of the wide picture, but admittedly, it might be tricky to find a pic that works in that size. What if we offer two size options, one the nice wide-look format, and one for smaller headshots like the other one that was posted a few minutes ago? (Sorry, can't find the link, just deleted a bunch of mail. D'oh.) > From: "mccreath" <mccreath at ak.net> > | I agree with the few comments that 180w x 90h is a weird aspect, but I > | wasn't in on the original discussions. However, I would like to opine that > | any *bigger* than that would be too big. Madhu, if you put a 120w x 140h > | picture in that box, you'd be using a fairly significant chunk of page > That's a good point ... what "would" be a good size of image? I think we > want to maintain consistency and enforce a specific image size for all pics. > Does look odd when the image doesn't fill the box .. looks like that block > isn't centred. Let's play with the image size, then tweak the box a bit > more.