[thesite] the new author box

[.jeff]

rudy,

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> From: rudy
>
> thanks for the sql, jeff, it shore looks familiar
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

yup, you helped me on it.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> so, sequenced by rating, with "real" articles ahead of
> all "other" ones, and in case of tied ratings, most
> often rated articles first, and if rated equally often,
> oldest articles to latest
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

precisely.  thank you for translating into english for those that don't
understand what the query is doing.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> don't go around changing your ratings, though -- people
> will come to expect it of you, and will forever chase
> after you, to change this one, or that one, or the other
> one please...
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

i didn't say i did it to bump your "lame" article out of that list did i?
if that was inferred, it wasn't intended.  i took a look at the article, a
look at my rating, and decided i'd rated it too high.

><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
> maybe you don't have an article near the top five
> overall evolt highest rated articles, but i do
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

i'm close (27 and 31 actually, so not *that* close).

thanks,

.jeff

http://evolt.org/
jeff at members.evolt.org
http://members.evolt.org/jeff/