[thesite] old links

Daniel J. Cody djc at members.evolt.org
Tue Mar 19 18:03:01 CST 2002

On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, aardvark wrote:
> > except the way we're doing it *is* standards compliant
> to 1.0... or 1.1... or one of them...

see, to me, this is like using HTML 3.2 instead of HTML4.01 because its
easier. why the double standard?

> SEs regularly traverse pages i've built with 302s...

they got it with the 301's there(obviously) too.

More information about the thesite mailing list