[Sysadmin] Content list archive

[Garrett Coakley]

On Wednesday, November 3, 2004  @909, Garrett Coakley wrote:


>When the content group was formed it was agreed that because of it's
>editorial nature it probably wasn't best having the discussion and
>dissection of articles in the queue open for archiving by google.
>
>It serves two purposes. It allows the content group to discuss articles
>freely, and it also saves the blushes of authors whose articles get denied.
>
>In the latter case specifically it was thought that editorial advice
>would be better received through content driven private email rather than
>a mass discussion.


Oh... and the password thing. 

(I'm always forgetting about that!)

G.


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Work : http://www.gencon.co.uk
         Play : http://polytechnic.co.uk
        Learn : http://evolt.org