[Sysadmin] Content list archive

[Jeremy Ashcraft]

ok, thanks guys......was just poking around the lists site and stumbled 
across that....no worries :)

Garrett Coakley wrote:

>On Wednesday, November 3, 2004  @909, Garrett Coakley wrote:
>
>
>  
>
>>When the content group was formed it was agreed that because of it's
>>editorial nature it probably wasn't best having the discussion and
>>dissection of articles in the queue open for archiving by google.
>>
>>It serves two purposes. It allows the content group to discuss articles
>>freely, and it also saves the blushes of authors whose articles get denied.
>>
>>In the latter case specifically it was thought that editorial advice
>>would be better received through content driven private email rather than
>>a mass discussion.
>>    
>>
>
>
>Oh... and the password thing. 
>
>(I'm always forgetting about that!)
>
>G.
>
>
>  
>