matt, ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > From: Warden, Matt > > I'm pretty sure we were trying to stick to the standard > and not the hack... > > 302 is permenantly moved... which is what we want > 301 is temporarily moved (right?)... which is not what > we want ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< actually, you've got it backwards. 302 is found or temporarily moved, depending on what reference you read. 301 is moved permanently. however, support for 301 seems to be shoddy at best. 301 -- Moved Permanently http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.2 302 -- Found http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.3 ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< > but, if it don't work, it don't work ><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>< kind of the reality check for anyone spouting about how their way is standards compliant, eh? .jeff http://evolt.org/ jeff at members.evolt.org http://members.evolt.org/jeff/