[Javascript] flash v dhtml
databarn
databarn at airmail.net
Fri Jun 29 11:17:17 CDT 2001
Flash is nice for a targeted audience that has the same perceptual capabilities as the developer(s). But you know what . . . I couldn't see the menus on any of the three sites mentioned so far. I'm at a resolution of 1600x1200, and the grey/white on black menus simply do not render well enough to read. On a "normal" (is there such a thing?) site, I can change font size - may mess up the developer's concepts, but I can still see the site, get a grasp of what was intended. Can't do that with flash. Know a colour-blind guy that just leaves Flash sites - he can't do anything with most of them because of contrast issues.
With something like 10% of the world colour-blind to some extent, and about 15% severely visually impaired (don't have reliable stats on this last percentage), I just cannot see Flash as a viable entry page to a general population commercial site, nor as a primary content container for the pages of such a site. Nice intro to a commercial animation site, though.
Make a good day . . .
. . . barn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Frisbeetarianism: The belief that when you die, your soul goes up on the roof and gets stuck.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________
From: Brian Andrews [bandrews at marlboro.edu]
To: javascript at latech.edu
Subject: Re: [Javascript] flash v dhtml
Time: 6/29/2001 at 10:50AM
A good example of a site that uses both DHTML and Flash. We even got Flash
and Javascript talking to each other.
http://www.RiverRunSoul.com
I did the DHTML.
Brian.
More information about the Javascript
mailing list