theres nothing wrong with dissecting things that we think are 'bad' on other web-dev lists me thinks. as long as its constructive, and the person sharing their opinions is willing to back up their opinions, and the discussion of whats ' bad' is in the context of making evolt 'better', rock on. if whoever can't handle constructive converstation amongst us, thats a fault of their own, not ours. :) .djc. On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Madhu Menon wrote: > At 01:41 AM 11/20/2001, A. Erickson opined: > >I know that this list is public but maybe it wouldn't be too horrible to > >dissect some of those other annoying list events, for our own > >edification. What do you think? > > Errr... it's not that I have a problem with my opinion being known and > archived. Heck, I've never had a problem with that. > One part of me tells me that badmouthing another list here wouldn't be a) > professional and b) a fair trial, since the defendant isn't present. > > The other part tells me that the other nice folks on theforum couldn't (and > possibly shouldn't) be bothered about what happens elsewhere unless it has > an impact on evolt. > > So I leave it to this list's members. If you want to hear about it, let me > know. Rudy, Amanda, Erika, and I already know what this is about, as > they're on that list too.