[Theforum] blah blah. Or, who gets to edit articles

.jeff jeff at members.evolt.org
Sun Dec 2 16:24:12 CST 2001


> From: Daniel J. Cody
> the backstabbing continues behind closed doors while
> everyone plays nice here in public. bullshit.

backstabbing there?  playing nice here?  what?!

> i've only skimmed that list [...]

that explains the comment above.  perhaps you're not understanding the
nature of the current discussions because you haven't thoroughly read them.

> i look in my 'good ideas' folder and see at least 15
> really good ideas for evolt in there that have been
> suggested in the short time this list has been around.
> i think its a shame that those ideas are getting left
> along the wayside while the majority of the discussion
> here and behind closed doors continues to focus not on
> positive things for evolt, but on the reasons why a
> select group of people should be allowed to edit
> articles in private.(for example)

your collection of good ideas that have been culled from this list and other
places does no one any good locked away on your machine.  furthermore, until
that list is public, no one but yourself can be held accountable for those
ideas not reaching maturation.  if you want people to pursue the ideas, they
have to know about them.  how about keeping the list updated in a public
place where those that are interested in following through on ideas can see
what's the latest and greatest ideas for evolt.org according to djc.

> just some thoughts to address a lot of the issues i'm
> seeing lined up, but won't read because, frankly, i've
> got better shit to do.

yet you'll malign some of us who happen to be on the admin list simply
because you can't be bothered to read the issues and understand them thereby
continuing the cycle of negative discussion?  pot?  kettle?



jeff at members.evolt.org

More information about the theforum mailing list