[theforum] mailing list rules (content)

[William Anderson]

Erika wrote:
> John Handelaar wrote:
>> Digest readers, especially (the freaks), are dealt a cruel injustice
>> by top-posters involving multiple chunks of near-unparseable
>> gibberish.  Assuming we want to keep them (weirdos), it's not a nice
>> thing to do.
> 
> That's a good point.  My experience is that I'd rather have the *new* 
> stuff above so I can see it quickly, the old stuff below for context. 
> But it's not all about me, of course.

A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?

-n