[thesite] cubic

[Daniel J. Cody]

for now i think using seperate ratings is the best way to go. once we 
get to the point where we *do* have enough 'things' to rate, it may be a 
good idea to start formulating some sort of algorithm to take them into 
account

thanks!

.djc.

Filip Salomonsson wrote:


> Do you mean as separate ratings (cubes, a number and a little sex icon), or
> calculating an overall rating taking all of those things into account (just
> cubes)? The latter would be an interesting approach - recognizing quality as
> well as quantity, as long as the "algorithm" is made as complete as possible
> from the very start. I don't think people would like having their rating
> drop a step or two because om some change in the way it's calculated.
> 
> Sounds to me like a better approach than just counting the articles written.
> Any other thoughts on this?